Hiding the Truth about Losing the War on Cancer
隱瞞抗癌敗仗的真相

For well over half a century we have been promised by mainstream medicine that a cure or major breakthrough for cancer was just around the corner. Every year we see promising new drugs and therapies announced. Yet every year we also see more people contract cancer and more people die of cancer.

超過半世紀以來，主流醫學承諾我們一個治癒癌症的突破，說快得到了。每年我們見到有希望的新藥和新療法公佈出來，但是我們亦見到更多人罹患癌症和更多人死於癌症。

Instead of focusing on natural and safe methods of prevention and treatment, we continue to treat by using surgery, chemotherapy and radiation to cut out, poison out and burn out the symptoms of cancer while leaving the underlying causes untreated -- and we continue to largely ignore the role that proper diet, nutrition and lifestyle plays in preventing and helping cure cancer.
注重自然及安全的防、治方法不用，反而繼續接受手術、化療及電療 -- 去切除、毒害及燒毀癌症的表面病徵，致病的原因卻不理。更不斷忽視生活操守如：飲食、營養、養生，來預防、治理癌症。

Although surgery does have some success against a limited number of cancers, chemo and radiation achieve at best a 3% increase in length of survival and true cures from cancer (meaning that the patient becomes completely cancer free and the cancer never returns). The fact is that for those who are diagnosed with cancer, after the third year the survival rate for those who had no treatment at all increases steadily and for those who had mainstream treatment it decreases steadily.
雖然手術對有限數目的癌症是有些成功，化療與電療對延長生存期及真的治癒率（真的治癒是指再沒有癌症及癌症不會復發）最高來說會達到 3%。事實上三年來沒有接受過治療的癌患者，其生存比率是穩步上升，較之接受過主流醫治的癌患者，其生存比率則持續下降。

Despite the dismal record, those in the $300 Billion a year cancer industry appear determined to maintain a stranglehold on treatment. One way they do so is to suppress natural alternatives. Another is to misreport their success rates by altering statistics to make their success appear to be much better than it actually is.
任憑成功個案差勁，那些每年營業額達三千億美元的癌事工業似乎?定了維持勒緊治癌的方法。一方面去壓迫自然的另類治療，另一方面去調改統計數字，亂報他們的成功率，使比實情好看得多。

Here are six ways that mainstream medicine misreports their statistics:
以下是主流醫學們用的六種方式去亂報他們的統計數據：

1. By re-defining "cure" as "alive five years after diagnosis": instead of using the word's real meaning, which is "cancer-free". Thus a patient could still have cancer the entire five years and die one day after the 5th anniversary date of diagnosis and still be recorded as a cure.
一. 「由診定為癌症日起計算仍可生存五年」解釋為「治癒」，取代原來「再沒有癌」的真實意思。因此，一個病人在整整五年內一直是患癌，就算在診定罹患癌症五週年的翌日死去，仍然當為一個治癒的記錄。

2. By simply omitting certain groups of people, such as African Americans, or by omitting certain types of cancer, such as all lung cancers patients, from their statistical calculations.
二. 把某一類病人種不計算在內，例如非洲裔美國人。或撇除某類的癌症，如在統計時不包括肺癌病患者。

3. By including types of cancer that are not life-threatening and are easily curable, such as skin cancers and DCIS.
三. 概括那些沒有致命或容易治癒的癌症，例如皮膚癌及癌前的症候。

The statistics most commonly reported include many such easily curable cancers, such as localized cancers of the cervix, non-spreading cancers and melanomas, as well as "cancers" that many feel are not true cancers at all, merely pre-cancers. For example, DCIS is a pre-cancerous condition that is 99% curable and makes up 30% of all breast cancers. Deduct that 30% from the brest cancer cure rates and survival statistics and the figures are much less impressive.
最普遍包括的統計數字是眾多易治癒的癌症，如子宮局部的癌瘤，不會擴散的癌瘤及黑素瘤，甚至所謂「癌瘤」其實不是真的癌瘤，只是未成癌的瘤。例如 99%能治癒的癌前症候，此類症候在乳癌症中佔 33%，如不計這 30% 的治癒率的話，乳癌生存率的統計數字就不大出色了。

4. By allowing earlier detection to erroneously imply longer survival.
四. 以盡早驗身來大大暗示生存期會長些。

5. By deleting patients from cancer treatment studies who die too soon, even if that is on the 89th day of a 90 day chemotherapy protocol.
五. 撇除在接受癌症治療時太早死去的癌症數目，甚至在 90 日的醫療方案中，病患者在第 89 日死去，亦不計在失敗內。

6. By using a questionable adjustment called "relative survival rate" where they get to deduct a certain number of cancer victims who statistics say would have died during the five years of other causes such as heart attacks, car wrecks, etc.
六. 用一個令人猜疑的改口，稱之為「相對生存率」，減去在患癌5年當中死於心臟病、撞車– 等等的病患者數目。

Source: Tanya Harter Pierce "Outsmart Your Cancer"
資料來源：一段文獻名叫「智勝你的癌症」; 作者 - Tanya Harter Pierce (皮亞士)

These outrageous "fudges", as Ms. Pierce too kindly calls them, have all been incorporated into cancer cure statistics to hide the fact that the war on cancer has been hopelessly lost and wrongly waged. In the opinion of many who are far more knowledgeable and qualified than I am, the so-called War on Cancer is little more than a hoax.
以上為皮亞士女士太厚道所稱的這些簡直駭人聽聞的「敷衍說法」，一直被算在「治癒癌病」的統計數字內，卻隱瞞了抗癌症鬥爭中的絕望失敗事實及一番枉鬥。跟據很多比我有知識及有資格的人評論，這些所謂「對癌開戰」不外是一個騙局。

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them." - Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).
Linus Pauling 博士(兩度諾貝爾醫學獎得主) 說：「每個人應了解到大部份的癌症研究，多半是一種詐騙，而且那些主要癌症研究機構，對支持他們的人犯上不盡責罪。」

"The National Anti-Cancer Program is a bunch of shit." - James Watson, Nobel Laureate for Medicine in 1962, joint discoverer of the double helix of DNA, and for two years a member of the U.S. Joint Advisory Committee on Cancer
1962年諾貝爾醫學獎得主 James Watson 亦說過：「那個國立抗癌方案簡直是堆糞土！」

When it comes to mainstream successes, of the three major mainstream treatment methods, surgery is the only one with respectable success rates and even then it is only successful the vast majority of the time in those who have operable types of cancer that has not yet metastasized at the time of diagnosis -- and most cancers are not detected prior to metastasizing.
談及主流醫學的成功處，三個主流醫學的醫療法中，切割是唯一有值得尊重的成功評價，雖是如此，大部份治癒機會是只限於病人中能接受切割癌瘤，而亦要他們的癌瘤在尚未擴散前為限，可是大多數癌瘤在未擴散前就被忽略了。

And when it comes to Chemo, in the words of Dr. Ralph Moss:
談到化療，Ralph Moss 醫生有以下幾句話：

"Chemo has some success in a few kinds of cancer, but in the conventional cancers which chemotherapy sometimes "works" such as small-cell lung cancers, the actual survival benefit is reckoned in weeks or months, not in years. And during this time, the patient is likely to experience major, even life threatening, side effects from the treatment, so the overall advantage to the patient is moot."
「化療對一少類癌症是有效，但對普通癌症，化療有時有效，如小細胞肺癌，生存率可達數星期或幾個月，但不會以年計。但在化療過程中，病人會感受到死亡的恐懼、診治時的副作用，整體來說，對病人是無意義。

Radiation results are even more dismal. In some studies, patients who opted for radiation have had lower survival rates than those who did not have radiation.(2)
電療的結果更是差勁，在一些研究中，選擇電療的病患者的生存率是低過沒有做過電療的。註二

Another common deception of mainstream medicine is to quote "response rates", which is defined as having a 50% tumor shrinkage for a period of twelve months. It has nothing to do with cure rates or long term survival, but it is the statistic that is often quoted to patients by their oncologists.
主流醫學的其他一個謊言是以12個月內腫瘤縮細了50% 界定為「回應率」。這些跟治癒率或延長生命拉不上關係，但腫瘤學家們時常對病人照樣引用這些統計數字。

Yet another deception is the use of the term "remission" to imply cure, when it is nothing of the sort. As "the Cancer Tutor" Webster Kehr writes in "The War Between Orthodox Medicine and Alternative Medicine":
還有另一個謊言以醫學術語之「重病的緩解期」暗指治癒，其實絕不同病理。這點「癌症教授」Webster Kehr已寫在他的著作《傳統醫學與另類治療的比試》中。

'First of all, the National Cancer Institute defines "remission" as:
首先，「國家癌症學院」對「重病的緩解期」定義是：

'A decrease in or disappearance of signs and symptoms of cancer. In partial remission, some, but not all, signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared. In complete remission, all signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared, although cancer still may be in the body.(3)
「癌症病徵及跡象的減少或消失」，在局部緩解期中，一些(不是全部)癌症病徵及跡象是會消失，以「完全緩解期」來說，癌病徵及癌跡象會沒有，但體內的癌瘤是仍會存在的(五行生化科技國際有限公司補充：這是沒問題的)。註三

'What exactly does this definition mean relative to the three "treatment decision criteria"? You, the citizen, are supposed to assume that "remission" means a person is cured of their cancer. But that is not what the definition states. It states there is an absence of "signs and symptoms." So is there a correlation between the absence of "signs and symptoms" and the three treatment decision criteria above?
究境哪三個「治療選用的標準」的定義確實是指甚麼？老百姓們一定以為「緩解期」是指病患者的癌治癒了，但那定義不是這意思，它指的是沒有「癌症病徵及跡象」，因此「沒有癌症病徵及跡象」與「三個治療標準」有何相干？

'Generally, the determination of remission is based on a reduction in the size of the tumor or in the change of some tumor marker. These things may indicate the number of cancer cells in the body, but they are very, very crude estimates of the number of cancer cells in the body. These numbers also do not measure the pain and suffering of the patient (i.e. the quality of life) or the status of the immunity system, which is very, very important if all of the cancer cells have not been killed.'
概括地說，緩解期的定斷是基於腫瘤縮細多少或腫瘤標記有何改變，緩解期或可標示出體內癌細胞仍在，但都是十分粗略的數字，是測不出身體內的癌細胞數目的，亦衡量不到病患者的痛楚及苦況(即是生活質素)或其免疫系統的狀況，如果所有癌細胞尚沒有被消滅到的話，這點是極為重要的。

Then there is what is likely the greatest mainstream deception of all: the millions of people who are diagnosed with cancer, but actually die from the damages done by chemotherapy and radiation, most frequently major organ failure. All of those deaths are recorded as due to cancer. Though that does not bolster the mainstream cancer treatment success rates, it helps hide the dangers and deaths due to mainstream treatments.
那麼，主流醫學又會來一個最大的謊言，那幾百萬個診斷患上癌症的人，其實是死於由化療及電療所致的傷害，最普通的，是他們的主要器官受了損。所有這些傷亡只被指為死於癌症。雖然這樣的記錄法增加不了主流醫學的成功率，但做到了隱瞞主流醫學所引致的危害與傷亡。

It should be plain that the war against cancer is not being won -- and to continue to claim otherwise after over half a century begs the question of why such obviously false and misleading claims and statistics continue to be the reason that this campaign is allowed to continue without question.
坦白來說，對癌症的一場仗是贏不了—-- 否則不會過了一世紀還不斷令人置疑這些明顯的虛假及誤導的統計數字為理據，在毫無質疑下，還不斷繼續這類推廣。

The war against cancer has lasted much longer and we have lost millions and millions of lives. After over half a century of failure, one has to ask how long will it take to admit it, stop deceiving the public, and move on to a different approach to stop the needless loss of lives?
對癌症的鬥爭已持續太久了，損失了百萬又百萬的生命。經過半世紀的失敗，尚要等待多久才承認失敗、停止欺騙社會、轉向另一氣同路徑來防止無辜的生命損失？

"In health there is freedom. Health is the first of all liberties." - Henri-Frederic Amiel 1828-1881
「有選擇健康的自由，但所有自由不及健康。」- Henri-Frederic。

"Nature alone can cure disease. Doctors cannot heal. They can only direct the sufferer back to the pathways of health. Nature alone can create, and healing is re-creation." - Dr. William S. Sadler
「大自然有能力單獨治癒疾病，醫師(醫生)不能，只能指導患者回歸健康之路，大自然能創造，治療只能扶正。」- William Sadler 醫生。

"Unless the doctor of today becomes the dietitian of tomorrow, the dietitian of today will become the doctor of tomorrow." - Dr. Alexis Carrol (Famous Biological Scientist and head of the Rockefeller Institute)
「祈望一天醫生與食療家能易地而處，互相瞭解。」- Alexis Carrol。他是著名的生物學家，美國洛克菲勒醫學院的首腦。(五行生化註：很多食療師本身是醫生，再作深造。)

Sources:
資料來源（註）

1. Dr. Ralph Moss and Webster Kehr, the "Cancer Tutor"
2. Tanya Harter Pierce, Dr. Rath Foundation
3. NCI - ((http://www.nci.nih.gov/dictionary/db_al...)

About the author

Tony Isaacs, is a natural health advocate and researcher and the author of books and articles about natural health including "Cancer's Natural Enemy" and "Collected Remedies"as well as song lyrics and humorous anecdotal stories. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to avoid prescription drugs and mainstream managed illness and live longer, healthier and happier lives naturally. He is currently residing in the scenic Texas hill country near Utopia, Texas where he serves as a consultant to the Utopia Silver colloidal silver and supplement company and where he is working on a major book project due for publication later this year. Mr. Isaacs also hosts the CureZone "Ask Tony Isaacs" forum as well as the Yahoo Health Group "Oleander Soup"

以上專題是獲得美國 Natural News 特別許可引用，譯本為香港「五行生化科技國際有限公司」翻譯，版權所有，不得擅用。
For further details of the text, please visit www.NaturalNews.com May edition 2008. Copyright Reserved.

The information on this page is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. E-5 Biotech and Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this page indicates your agreement to these terms and those published by NaturalNews.com.
本文僅作學術性及消閒性資訊，絕無作為補充任何專業意見之意思。文章內容與本公司(五行)的所有產品並無關係。本公司(五行)及原文發行人不就使用或誤用本文所引致的任何後果負責。如你一經使用本頁內容即代表你同意了NaturalNews.com 的相關約章。